header-logo header-logo

14 July 2017 / Tim Malloch
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , EU , Environment
printer mail-detail

A Chinese takeaway (Pt 5)

nlj_7754_malloch

Brexit, HPC & state aid: mission Impossible? Tim Malloch returns with a post election update

  • As the Hinkley Point C saga unfolds against the backdrop of Brexit will the Austrians audit the National Audit Office?

Following the recent UK general election the prospect of a softer Brexit has been revived. If the UK opted for the ‘Norwegian’ model and joined the EEA then
EU state aid rules may apply (‘A Chinese Takeaway’ (Pt 4)). The Commission has also said that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU would not deprive the European Court of Justice of its competence to adjudicate in proceedings pending on the withdrawal date.

NAO report

Last month the National Audit Office (NAO) published a report on Hinkley Point C (HPC) that described the project as ‘risky and expensive’ and suggested that the UK Government develops a Plan B (the NAO report). This month EDF announced a further cost overrun of £1.5bn for HPC, estimating project completion costs to be £19.6bn. The NAO report and EDF’s announcement are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll