header-logo header-logo

Churchill clarifies mediation order conundrum

30 November 2023
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation
printer mail-detail
Courts can order parties to engage in mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution, the Court of Appeal has clarified

The much-anticipated ruling, Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil [2023] EWCA Civ 1416, down this week, confirms it is not a breach of human rights to order parties to mediate. It was held courts can lawfully stay proceedings or order the parties to engage in non-court-based dispute resolution processes which include mediation.

It overturns Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576, which suggested ordering parties to mediate would breach their Art 6 right to a fair trial. The court in Churchill confirmed that comments made by Lord Justice Dyson in Halsey were obiter and therefore not binding on the lower courts.

‘The court’s decision should not only help parties resolve their disputes faster and with less expense, but also save time for the courts and justice system,’ said Elaina Bailes, partner at Stewarts, which acted pro bono for interveners Civil Mediation Council, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Centre of Effective Dispute Resolution.

Bailes said the ruling was ‘a welcome development for dispute resolution in England and Wales, recognising that alternative dispute resolution is an integral part of the justice system’.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the judgment ‘made clear the parameters governing when parties can be required to enter into a non-court-based dispute resolution process before proceeding with a civil claim.

‘The Law Society strongly believes that non-court-based dispute resolution will usually be in the best interests of the parties, but has always had real reservations about a blanket rule making any form of such process mandatory. This judgment reflects those reservations in that it recognises that in some circumstances it may be contrary to a party’s right of access to the courts to compel them to engage in a non-court-based dispute resolution process.

‘We welcome the court’s clear guidance as to when and how judges should intervene.’

Rebecca Clark, chair, Civil Mediation Council, said: ‘Mediation is now where it should be—firmly embedded within the civil justice system.’

James South, chief executive of CEDR, said the judgment ‘gives the courts the tools to actively encourage settlement by allowing courts for the first time to order parties to mediate, if in their discretion they consider it reasonable to do so’.

Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Cripps—Simon Main

Cripps—Simon Main

Firm strengthens residential property team with partner hire

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Hugh James—Danielle Cahill

Private wealth disputes team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar 2025 and joint head of chambers at 4PB, sets out in this week's NLJ how the profession will respond to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s review into bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct at the Bar
back-to-top-scroll