header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 October 2015

How to reject, consumer style & “Where does that sweet DJ sit?”

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: SECOND DOLLOP

Goodbye Now the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) (see “Civil way”, NLJ, 9 October 2015, p17) gets exciting: well, more exciting. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979), s 11 right to reject within a reasonable time (and a full refund) is replaced for consumer sales (but not for digital content) with a short-term right which is generally 30 days from delivery or earlier transfer of ownership but for perishable goods, substitute any shorter period before which perishing would occur. Time stops running if the consumer—they have no obligation to do so—requests or agrees to repair or replacement. The parties can agree to an extension (which might be useful if the trader is denying liability and the consumer wants the goods to be expertly tested or the consumer who fears that the manifestation of a defect may take longer than 30 days and wishes to preserve the right to a short-term rejection beyond 30 days

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll