header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 October 2015

How to reject, consumer style & “Where does that sweet DJ sit?”

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: SECOND DOLLOP

Goodbye Now the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) (see “Civil way”, NLJ, 9 October 2015, p17) gets exciting: well, more exciting. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979), s 11 right to reject within a reasonable time (and a full refund) is replaced for consumer sales (but not for digital content) with a short-term right which is generally 30 days from delivery or earlier transfer of ownership but for perishable goods, substitute any shorter period before which perishing would occur. Time stops running if the consumer—they have no obligation to do so—requests or agrees to repair or replacement. The parties can agree to an extension (which might be useful if the trader is denying liability and the consumer wants the goods to be expertly tested or the consumer who fears that the manifestation of a defect may take longer than 30 days and wishes to preserve the right to a short-term rejection beyond 30 days

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll