header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 6 October 2023

06 October 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Updates on CPR updates; Online with court funds; Service charge insurance attacks

THE NOT FRC CORNER

Let’s not forget that there is much more to life than fixed recoverable costs. Well, a little more. The Civil Procedure (Amendment No 3) Rules 2023 (SI 2023/788) and CPR PD update 158 introduced on 1 October 2023 an abundance of other stuff which has nothing to do with costs but which might be perceived by the cynical as a lot about nothing. There’s gender neutralising, clarifying, rearranging, simplifying and tinkering. In short, making sure that your practice books become hopelessly out of date. In fact, upon studying CPR 22.1 and PD22 para 1.2 you might be momentarily fooled, like me, into excitement at the removal of a response to an order to provide further information in compliance with an order, from the list of documents that must be verified by a statement of truth. Alas, the reference to the response has gone because its is covered by the inclusion of statement of case.

Showing contempt

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll