header-logo header-logo

Civil Way: 25 January 2008

24 January 2008 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Guided - to give you an extra 4%

The contentious contentious —if you know what we mean—guideline rates for the summary assessment of costs have been raised by 4% (to keep in line with the average earnings in private sector services) for work done after 31 December 2007 (see NLJ, 11 January 2008, pp 59–60). The rates which are habitually quoted, cursed, blessed and often judicially adopted are available in civil and family cases. The last rise was one year ago, after a two-year nap. The latest update is temporary. A completely new set of rates is expected by mid-

2008.

City of grade A fee earners are the winners—yes, we know about the rent review—at £396 per hour, down to £304 in central and £219–256 for other courts in the group.

 

Argue and you shall be heard

The guide is intended to be of help and assistance to judges but not as a substitute for the proper exercise of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll