header-logo header-logo

24 January 2008 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 25 January 2008

Guided - to give you an extra 4%

The contentious contentious —if you know what we mean—guideline rates for the summary assessment of costs have been raised by 4% (to keep in line with the average earnings in private sector services) for work done after 31 December 2007 (see NLJ, 11 January 2008, pp 59–60). The rates which are habitually quoted, cursed, blessed and often judicially adopted are available in civil and family cases. The last rise was one year ago, after a two-year nap. The latest update is temporary. A completely new set of rates is expected by mid-

2008.

City of grade A fee earners are the winners—yes, we know about the rent review—at £396 per hour, down to £304 in central and £219–256 for other courts in the group.

 

Argue and you shall be heard

The guide is intended to be of help and assistance to judges but not as a substitute for the proper exercise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll