header-logo header-logo

Civil Way: 25 January 2008

24 January 2008 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Guided - to give you an extra 4%

The contentious contentious —if you know what we mean—guideline rates for the summary assessment of costs have been raised by 4% (to keep in line with the average earnings in private sector services) for work done after 31 December 2007 (see NLJ, 11 January 2008, pp 59–60). The rates which are habitually quoted, cursed, blessed and often judicially adopted are available in civil and family cases. The last rise was one year ago, after a two-year nap. The latest update is temporary. A completely new set of rates is expected by mid-

2008.

City of grade A fee earners are the winners—yes, we know about the rent review—at £396 per hour, down to £304 in central and £219–256 for other courts in the group.

 

Argue and you shall be heard

The guide is intended to be of help and assistance to judges but not as a substitute for the proper exercise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Employment boutique strengthens litigation bench with partner hire

Fladgate—Milan Kapadia

Fladgate—Milan Kapadia

Partner appointed to dispute resolution team

Carey Olsen—Louise Stothard

Carey Olsen—Louise Stothard

Employment law offering in Guernsey expands with new hire

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll