header-logo header-logo

Clamping down on City bullies

09 July 2025
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Employment , Harassment
printer mail-detail
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has clarified that serious bullying and harassment in financial firms amounts to misconduct, and will extend this to about 37,000 other regulated firms next September

It is clamping down on ‘rolling bad apples’ who move from firm to firm to avoid the consequences of their own action. Under the new rules, ‘serious, substantiated’ cases of poor personal behaviour will need to be shared through regulatory references.

Previously, it was unclear when this type of behaviour would be a breach of the conduct rules in a firm other than a bank.

FCA deputy chief executive Sarah Pritchard said: ‘Behaviour like bullying or harassment going unchallenged is one of the reddest flags—a culture where this occurs can raise questions about a firm's decision making and risk management.’

To help firms apply the rules, the FCA has issued draft guidance, ‘Tackling non-financial misconduct in financial firms’, open for consultation until 10 September.

Christine Braamskamp, managing partner, Jenner & Block, highlighted the draft guidance requires senior managers to protect staff from non-financial misconduct by ‘intervening to stop such behaviour where appropriate if the manager knows or should know of it’.

This could ‘place a very significant personal burden on senior managers to take action in potentially nebulous circumstances in an era where cancel culture is rife, and offence can sometimes be in the eye of the beholder’, Braamskamp said.

Braamskamp said the draft guidance also noted an individual’s life outside work or on social media might affect their fitness for a regulated role. She called for more clarity and examples to help firms understand their duties.

Rachel Couter, partner, Osborne Clarke, welcomed the FCA’s decision to scrap earlier plans to amend its ‘FIT’ test for candidates with reference to ‘vague concepts of “moral soundness, rectitude and steady adherence to an ethical code”.

‘This should allow more consistency in interpretation and application of the rules, both by regulated firms and those within the regulators themselves. The FCA has also helpfully expressly confirmed that firms are not expected proactively to monitor employees’ private lives.’

James Alleyne, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘Given the FCA’s bold public stance on non-financial misconduct before now, it is disappointing that it is undertaking yet another consultation, has watered down its previous proposals and is still yet to publish detailed guidance.’

Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Employment , Harassment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll