header-logo header-logo

Clients demand more from law firms

08 November 2007
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

News

Law firms are reluctant to help clients control costs and move away from hourly billing, according to in-house counsel research.

The CMS Cameron McKenna report, How much? Over Priced, Over Paid & Over Budget?, shows that in-house counsel want service providers to move away from charging hourly rates and adopt “concept billing” instead. Respondents said that hourly billing offers little reflection of value and provides little incentive to be cost effective.

Richard Price, senior partner at CMS Cameron McKenna, says: “The demand for better response from their legal advisers seems to far outweigh tangible evidence of improvement across the sector.
“Disappointingly, only 40% of interviewees felt that law firms have responded proactively in helping them to reduce costs.”

Respondents were also critical of firms’ project management skills. One in-house lawyer said: “It’s madness that you’re paying £90,000 for a newly qualified. It’s madness that lawyers have to work 2,000 billable hours.
On the bigger stuff they rate you for a job but what I get from them is their cost drivers and need for good people.”

Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll