header-logo header-logo

12 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Complaints-handling concerns raised

The Legal Services Consumer Panel (LSCP), which advises the Legal Services Board on regulation, has reiterated its call for lawyers to be made to publish data on all complaints they receive

The LSCP described the current complaints-handling situation this week as a matter of ‘deep concern’. It initially urged publication of first-tier complaints a decade ago.

Last month, the Bar Standards Board proposed mandating barristers to report all first-tier complaints to their regulator, in its consultation, New arrangements and rules for first-tier complaints handling. In May 2024, the Legal Services Board published guidance last year advising that complaints be resolved within eight weeks where possible.

Tom Hayhoe, chair of the LSCP, said: ‘Consumers should not feel disillusioned or ignored when they raise complaints.

‘Recent scandals in the legal sector have highlighted how important complaints intelligence can be.’ The LSCP is also calling for standardised protocols so that consumers who complain receive ‘a fair and consistent experience’, and greater collaboration between regulators and service providers. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll