header-logo header-logo

Complaints-handling concerns raised

12 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-detail
The Legal Services Consumer Panel (LSCP), which advises the Legal Services Board on regulation, has reiterated its call for lawyers to be made to publish data on all complaints they receive

The LSCP described the current complaints-handling situation this week as a matter of ‘deep concern’. It initially urged publication of first-tier complaints a decade ago.

Last month, the Bar Standards Board proposed mandating barristers to report all first-tier complaints to their regulator, in its consultation, New arrangements and rules for first-tier complaints handling. In May 2024, the Legal Services Board published guidance last year advising that complaints be resolved within eight weeks where possible.

Tom Hayhoe, chair of the LSCP, said: ‘Consumers should not feel disillusioned or ignored when they raise complaints.

‘Recent scandals in the legal sector have highlighted how important complaints intelligence can be.’ The LSCP is also calling for standardised protocols so that consumers who complain receive ‘a fair and consistent experience’, and greater collaboration between regulators and service providers. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll