header-logo header-logo

10 June 2020 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Conference call

22372
Expert witnesses at a conference with counsel—a practical guide—compiled by Mark Solon
  • This guide is intended to help expert witnesses understand the purpose of a conference with counsel.
  • If you are a lawyer, you can cut out and keep this article to pass to your expert if they are to attend a conference. I will focus on civil claims but similar principles apply to arbitrations, criminal and family matters. 

A conference between the expert and counsel is an important stage in the litigation process. Both lawyers and experts should prepare carefully to ensure conferences are as effective as possible. Many problems ranging from embarrassment to criminal proceedings can be avoided if a conference is conducted properly.

The starting point for the instruction of experts in civil claims is the guidance issued by the Civil Justice Council (https://bit.ly/3dE9VG5). The purpose of this guidance is to assist litigants, those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying with Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and court orders.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll