header-logo header-logo

Contempt of court—Appeal against sentence—Role of Court of Appeal

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 828, [2011] All ER (D) 188 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Laws, Longmore and Etherton LJJ, 21 July 2011

The approach of the Court of Appeal exercising its appellate jurisdiction under s 13 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 (AJA 1960) in respect of a sentence imposed for contempt of court is to determine whether the sentence was manifestly excessive; it is not a judicial review exercise.

Hugh Southey QC and Kate Markus (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC and Steven Gray (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the respondent

The appellant, B, was subject to proceedings before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC). SIAC formed the view that B was a high level risk to the UK. He was not a UK citizen and was made subject to stringent bail conditions. The secretary of state wished to deport him to Algeria, since it was believed he was an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll