header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court—Appeal against sentence—Role of Court of Appeal

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 828, [2011] All ER (D) 188 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Laws, Longmore and Etherton LJJ, 21 July 2011

The approach of the Court of Appeal exercising its appellate jurisdiction under s 13 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 (AJA 1960) in respect of a sentence imposed for contempt of court is to determine whether the sentence was manifestly excessive; it is not a judicial review exercise.

Hugh Southey QC and Kate Markus (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC and Steven Gray (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the respondent

The appellant, B, was subject to proceedings before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC). SIAC formed the view that B was a high level risk to the UK. He was not a UK citizen and was made subject to stringent bail conditions. The secretary of state wished to deport him to Algeria, since it was believed he was an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll