header-logo header-logo

Contingency fees under spotlight

01 October 2009
Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

All plans to regulate contingency fees should be stopped pending the publication of Lord Justice Jackson’s Review into costs in December, the Bar Council has warned.

An amendment to the Coroners and Justice Bill, currently progressing through Parliament, would  regulate contingency fees, which are often used in employment tribunal cases, protecting members of the public from being exploited by ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers.

However, in its response to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation on damages based agreements, the Bar said further consultation was required and called for their introduction via the Bill to be halted.

Costs specialist barrister Nick Bacon, who led the Bar’s response, said: “What is being proposed in the Coroners and Justice Bill as currently formulated is a wholesale reversal of the law against contingency fees.” 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
Peter Kandler’s honorary KC marks long-overdue recognition of a man who helped prise open a closed legal world. In NLJ this week, Roger Smith, columnist and former director of JUSTICE, traces how Kandler founded the UK’s first law centre in 1970, challenging a profession that was largely seen as 'fixers for the rich and apologists for criminals'
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll