header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Copyright—European Union

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TV Catchup Ltd [2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat), [2011] All ER (D) 175 (Jul)

Section 2(2)(b) of the European Communities Act 1972 was not to be approached restrictively. The primary objective of any legislation implemented under that section had to be to bring into force laws which, by treaty, the United Kingdom had agreed to make as part of her laws. Section 2(2)(b) allowed for legislation which was not necessarily for the implementation of Council Directive (EC) 2000/29 (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), which was consistent with the Directive but which did not have the same purpose.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll