header-logo header-logo

Costs budgeting: a risky business

17 November 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail
nlj_7770_kendall

Trivial, serious or significant? Francis Kendall reviews recent excuses for breaches & shares the consequences

If parties and their lawyers have learnt just one thing about costs budgeting by now, you would have hoped that it is the importance of getting their budget in on time. But still parties are missing the deadline and then—facing a budget limited to the applicable court fee—have to roll the dice with the Denton test when they apply for relief from sanctions. It is worth reviewing two cases from the summer which led to very different results.

No sensible excuse

In Lakhani & Anor v Mahmud & Ors [2017] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 55 (Jul) the defendants served their £50,000 budget just one day late, but only applied for relief at the case and costs management conference (CCMC). HH Judge Lochrane in Central London County Court acknowledged that, in certain circumstances, being one day late with a costs budget ‘might not be regarded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll