header-logo header-logo

17 November 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Costs budgeting: a risky business

nlj_7770_kendall

Trivial, serious or significant? Francis Kendall reviews recent excuses for breaches & shares the consequences

If parties and their lawyers have learnt just one thing about costs budgeting by now, you would have hoped that it is the importance of getting their budget in on time. But still parties are missing the deadline and then—facing a budget limited to the applicable court fee—have to roll the dice with the Denton test when they apply for relief from sanctions. It is worth reviewing two cases from the summer which led to very different results.

No sensible excuse

In Lakhani & Anor v Mahmud & Ors [2017] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 55 (Jul) the defendants served their £50,000 budget just one day late, but only applied for relief at the case and costs management conference (CCMC). HH Judge Lochrane in Central London County Court acknowledged that, in certain circumstances, being one day late with a costs budget ‘might not be regarded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll