header-logo header-logo

29 December 2020
Issue: 7915 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs lawyers report back from the pandemic

Costs lawyers have weathered the COVID-19 crisis well, with more than a third reporting they are busier than ever

Responding to the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) annual survey 37% of costs lawyers said they were busier than before the pandemic and a further 38% said the crisis had not made much difference to their practice.

However, 15% said their workload had reduced, one respondent had lost their job and three of the lawyers said they were having to consider making redundancies.

The survey was completed by 126 lawyers or about one fifth of the profession.

Nearly half the costs lawyers have not found it easy to conduct hearings online, although four out of ten noted how opposing parties have cooperated well to make remote hearings work.

More than one in five worked from home prior to the pandemic, and a further 29% said working from home has become a permanent choice for them. However, nearly one in five reported problems supervising colleagues at home.

One in six respondents said solicitors are paying their bills more slowly

ACL chair Claire Green said: ‘The vital role of costs lawyers in ensuring that solicitors are properly paid for the work they do has come to the fore during the pandemic―there has never been a more important time for firms to realise the value of their efforts.

‘Covid has, of course, been difficult for everyone but it has had the positive side effect of encouraging greater digitisation, whether in time recording and preparing bundles for hearings, as well as embedding the electronic bill yet further. The Senior Costs Judge has made clear that he expects remote hearings to remain part of the Senior Courts Costs Office’s work even after life returns to normal, especially for short hearings.

‘What costs lawyers have proven over recent months is that they are adaptable, increasingly tech-savvy and able to step up when their clients need them.’

Issue: 7915 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll