header-logo header-logo

Costs lawyers report back from the pandemic

29 December 2020
Issue: 7915 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
Costs lawyers have weathered the COVID-19 crisis well, with more than a third reporting they are busier than ever

Responding to the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) annual survey 37% of costs lawyers said they were busier than before the pandemic and a further 38% said the crisis had not made much difference to their practice.

However, 15% said their workload had reduced, one respondent had lost their job and three of the lawyers said they were having to consider making redundancies.

The survey was completed by 126 lawyers or about one fifth of the profession.

Nearly half the costs lawyers have not found it easy to conduct hearings online, although four out of ten noted how opposing parties have cooperated well to make remote hearings work.

More than one in five worked from home prior to the pandemic, and a further 29% said working from home has become a permanent choice for them. However, nearly one in five reported problems supervising colleagues at home.

One in six respondents said solicitors are paying their bills more slowly

ACL chair Claire Green said: ‘The vital role of costs lawyers in ensuring that solicitors are properly paid for the work they do has come to the fore during the pandemic―there has never been a more important time for firms to realise the value of their efforts.

‘Covid has, of course, been difficult for everyone but it has had the positive side effect of encouraging greater digitisation, whether in time recording and preparing bundles for hearings, as well as embedding the electronic bill yet further. The Senior Costs Judge has made clear that he expects remote hearings to remain part of the Senior Courts Costs Office’s work even after life returns to normal, especially for short hearings.

‘What costs lawyers have proven over recent months is that they are adaptable, increasingly tech-savvy and able to step up when their clients need them.’

Issue: 7915 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll