header-logo header-logo

Costs lawyers want to axe Solicitors Act

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Is the SA 1974 out of date?

The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has called for the Solicitors Act 1974 to be repealed. 

Writing in NLJ this week, ACL chairman Murray Heining argues that changes to the legal landscape resulting from the Legal Services Act 2007, the Jackson reforms and the increased categories of persons authorised to provide legal services, mean the Act is now irrelevant. For example, different costs rules apply to contentious and non-contentious proceedings, while nearly 40 years on “costs lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys all have independent rights to conduct litigation, as from next month will barristers”. He adds that chartered legal executives are likely to join the list, and licensed conveyancers and chartered accountants also want litigation rights.

Heining says the current review of regulation, which may lead to an Act of Parliament, provides the perfect opportunity to “sort out this inconsistency of approach”.

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll