header-logo header-logo

Could do better—diversity within the legal profession

02 February 2022
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail
The legal profession is slowly becoming more diverse, data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and Bar Standards Board (BSB) reveals

A disproportionately high number of lawyers come from a privileged background compared to the UK population. However, the largest firms have the greatest proportion of those who went to independent or fee-paying schools, at 29% (30% in 2019) compared to 16% at one-partner firms and 7.5% of the working population as a whole and the greatest proportion of lawyers from a professional socio-economic background, at 68% compared to 46% at one-partner firms and 37% of the working population.

Women make up 61% of solicitors but only 35% of partners (up from 34% in 2019), although only 31% of partners at larger firms. Black, Asian or minority ethnic origin solicitors make up 17% of the profession (up 0.5%) but only 8% of partners at larger firms compared to 23% at firms with two-five partners and 35% at one-partner firms.

Disability within the profession appears to be under-reported, at 5% (up from 4% in 2019) compared to 14% of the wider UK working population.

Anna Bradley, Chair of the SRA, said: ‘We know that many firms have excellent initiatives in place to address progression and retention, but there is clearly more to be done.’

Over at the Bar, men continue to outnumber women (nearly 39% of barristers and nearly 18% (up one per cent) of QCs), according to the BSB’s annual diversity report.

The percentage of barristers from minority ethnic backgrounds (nearly 15%) now matches the working population of the UK, although not yet at silk level (less than 10% are from minority ethnic backgrounds). However, people from a Black/Black British background remain underrepresented at all levels of the Bar.

Less than 7% of barristers disclosed a disability.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Shadae Cazeau said: ‘The Bar is increasingly diverse, but there is still more work to be done.’

Issue: 7965 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll