header-logo header-logo

Court competition hots up

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

England & Wales working to stay ahead of global markets

London’s commercial courts are increasingly international, but competition from regional hubs remains fierce, according to an annual report.

The Commercial Courts Report 2018, commissioned by communications agency Portland, analyses the 158 judgments from the London commercial courts between March 2017 and April 2018. It found that 656 litigants from 69 countries were represented in the past year, up from 62 countries in 2015/16.

More than 40% (267 litigants) were from the UK. Kazakhstan accounted for 31 litigants, the second highest nationality in terms of representation. Russian and US litigants were the joint third most likely nationality to appear, with 20 litigants each. Next came, in order, Germany, UAE, Singapore, Turkey, Cyprus, Panama, India, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Jersey.

There was also a 22% increase in the total number of litigants using the commercial courts compared to 2017. However, London faces stiff competition from abroad, such as the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts (DIFC), the Qatar International Court (QIC), the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts (ADGMC) and the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC).

Charles Balmain, committee member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA), and a partner at White & Case, said: ‘The English court system remains amongst the global elite, known worldwide for the high calibre of its Judges.

‘We are already seeing the English courts react to keep ahead of growing competition from other fora. In particular, we are seeing increased use of technology, and the trial of new, streamlined, disclosure processes aimed at balancing the benefit of this process with the time and cost involved. We are confident that such improvements will only heighten the popularity of England as a forum for dispute resolution and are delighted to see this reflected in the Commercial Courts Report 2018.’ 

Philip Hall, partner at Portland, said the London Commercial Courts are well placed but ‘cannot be complacent’.

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll