header-logo header-logo

Court grants service by blockchain

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail
Mr Justice Trower in the High Court has granted permission to serve court documents on unknown fraudsters via the transfer of a token on blockchain, in a legal first

D’Aloia v Binance Holdings & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 (Ch), is the first reported court order of its kind in Europe, and second only to a case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in June (LCX AG v John Does Nos 1-25).

D’Aloia concerned an application for an urgent injunction made by Mr D’Aloia, the Italian founder of an online gambling company. He had discovered unknown persons had cloned his online brokerage and were misappropriating his cryptocurrency to encourage investors to place trades into two wallets.

According to Giambrone solicitors, acting for Mr D’Aloia, the court order is significant for two reasons. First, it allowed service by way of NFT (non-fungible token) airdrop to the two wallets and opens the way to use blockchain technology to serve proceedings in international crypto disputes thus overcoming a practical hurdle. Second, it recognised the five cryptocurrency exchange defendants held Mr D’Aloia’s cryptocurrency as constructive trustees. This means the exchanges are responsible for making sure the crypto is ringfenced and not moved on or withdrawn.

Giambrone associate Joanna Bailey said: ‘The importance of the court’s finding of a good arguable case of constructive trustee liability cannot be overstated.

‘Should cryptocurrency exchanges act contrary to such orders and fail to ringfence the identifiable cryptocurrency, they risk being held liable for breach of trust.’

Alternative service via various online methods has previously been authorised by the English Courts under CPR 6.15, including Instagram, Facebook and via a ‘contact’ section of the defendant’s website, but never before by means of distributed ledger technology (like blockchain).

Kate Gee, counsel at Signature Litigation, said: ‘Crypto exchanges must now take seriously the risks of claims against them for breach of trust, and take robust steps to ringfence identifiable cryptocurrency that is the subject of a dispute.’

Zoe Wyatt, partner at Andersen in the UK, said: ‘This case gives hope to those who have fallen victim to cryptoasset scams.’

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll