header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Court grants service by blockchain

Mr Justice Trower in the High Court has granted permission to serve court documents on unknown fraudsters via the transfer of a token on blockchain, in a legal first

D’Aloia v Binance Holdings & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 (Ch), is the first reported court order of its kind in Europe, and second only to a case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in June (LCX AG v John Does Nos 1-25).

D’Aloia concerned an application for an urgent injunction made by Mr D’Aloia, the Italian founder of an online gambling company. He had discovered unknown persons had cloned his online brokerage and were misappropriating his cryptocurrency to encourage investors to place trades into two wallets.

According to Giambrone solicitors, acting for Mr D’Aloia, the court order is significant for two reasons. First, it allowed service by way of NFT (non-fungible token) airdrop to the two wallets and opens the way to use blockchain technology to serve proceedings in international crypto disputes thus overcoming a practical hurdle. Second, it recognised the five cryptocurrency exchange defendants held Mr D’Aloia’s cryptocurrency as constructive trustees. This means the exchanges are responsible for making sure the crypto is ringfenced and not moved on or withdrawn.

Giambrone associate Joanna Bailey said: ‘The importance of the court’s finding of a good arguable case of constructive trustee liability cannot be overstated.

‘Should cryptocurrency exchanges act contrary to such orders and fail to ringfence the identifiable cryptocurrency, they risk being held liable for breach of trust.’

Alternative service via various online methods has previously been authorised by the English Courts under CPR 6.15, including Instagram, Facebook and via a ‘contact’ section of the defendant’s website, but never before by means of distributed ledger technology (like blockchain).

Kate Gee, counsel at Signature Litigation, said: ‘Crypto exchanges must now take seriously the risks of claims against them for breach of trust, and take robust steps to ringfence identifiable cryptocurrency that is the subject of a dispute.’

Zoe Wyatt, partner at Andersen in the UK, said: ‘This case gives hope to those who have fallen victim to cryptoasset scams.’

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll