header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Court grants service by blockchain

Mr Justice Trower in the High Court has granted permission to serve court documents on unknown fraudsters via the transfer of a token on blockchain, in a legal first

D’Aloia v Binance Holdings & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 (Ch), is the first reported court order of its kind in Europe, and second only to a case in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in June (LCX AG v John Does Nos 1-25).

D’Aloia concerned an application for an urgent injunction made by Mr D’Aloia, the Italian founder of an online gambling company. He had discovered unknown persons had cloned his online brokerage and were misappropriating his cryptocurrency to encourage investors to place trades into two wallets.

According to Giambrone solicitors, acting for Mr D’Aloia, the court order is significant for two reasons. First, it allowed service by way of NFT (non-fungible token) airdrop to the two wallets and opens the way to use blockchain technology to serve proceedings in international crypto disputes thus overcoming a practical hurdle. Second, it recognised the five cryptocurrency exchange defendants held Mr D’Aloia’s cryptocurrency as constructive trustees. This means the exchanges are responsible for making sure the crypto is ringfenced and not moved on or withdrawn.

Giambrone associate Joanna Bailey said: ‘The importance of the court’s finding of a good arguable case of constructive trustee liability cannot be overstated.

‘Should cryptocurrency exchanges act contrary to such orders and fail to ringfence the identifiable cryptocurrency, they risk being held liable for breach of trust.’

Alternative service via various online methods has previously been authorised by the English Courts under CPR 6.15, including Instagram, Facebook and via a ‘contact’ section of the defendant’s website, but never before by means of distributed ledger technology (like blockchain).

Kate Gee, counsel at Signature Litigation, said: ‘Crypto exchanges must now take seriously the risks of claims against them for breach of trust, and take robust steps to ringfence identifiable cryptocurrency that is the subject of a dispute.’

Zoe Wyatt, partner at Andersen in the UK, said: ‘This case gives hope to those who have fallen victim to cryptoasset scams.’

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll