header-logo header-logo

22 January 2015 / Kerry Underwood
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Coventry: a costs calamity in waiting?

A phoney war or a £15bn headache for the government? Kerry Underwood counts down to the Coventry v Lawrence finale

The legal New Year feels like 1939, waiting for an inevitable war anticipating the Supreme Court hearing of Coventry v Lawrence, listed for 9, 10 and the morning of 12 February 2015, to be heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson, Lord Sumption, and Lord Carnwath. It may turn out to be a phoney war with the Supreme Court maintaining the status quo and upholding the right of the UK Parliament to govern the costs regime in the UK courts. Or it may not.

Background

The case is about whether the system of recoverability of additional liabilities, that is success fees and after-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums, in place from April 2000 to April 2013, breaches the European Convention on Human Rights, which forms part of our domestic law due to the Human Rights Act 1998.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll