header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Cracking it

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
06 December 2013 / Ross Risby
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
web_risby

Ross Risby highlights the value of selecting the best experts in professional negligence litigation
The expert evidence given at trial often plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate outcome of professional negligence litigation. Three recent cases act as reminders of the importance which needs to be placed on selection of the experts, if a party is to be given the best chance of success at trial.

 

Survey failings

In Igloo Regeneration (General Partner) Ltd v Powell William Partnership [2013] EWHC 1718 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 257 (Jun) the claimant had bought historic mill buildings in Leeds in 2003. Prior to the purchase, it engaged the defendant surveyors and engineers (PWP) to survey those buildings. PWP reported that cracking was visible in three brick piers and suggested that remedial ties should be installed, the situation monitored and £20,000 be retained for future remedial work.

Serious increases in crack size were subsequently recorded which were later accepted as being consistent with compression failure. Remedial works cost substantially more than the £20,000 PWP had suggested

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor finance faces £11bn reckoning
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll