header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 December 2013 / Ross Risby
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Cracking it

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_risby

Ross Risby highlights the value of selecting the best experts in professional negligence litigation
The expert evidence given at trial often plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate outcome of professional negligence litigation. Three recent cases act as reminders of the importance which needs to be placed on selection of the experts, if a party is to be given the best chance of success at trial.

 

Survey failings

In Igloo Regeneration (General Partner) Ltd v Powell William Partnership [2013] EWHC 1718 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 257 (Jun) the claimant had bought historic mill buildings in Leeds in 2003. Prior to the purchase, it engaged the defendant surveyors and engineers (PWP) to survey those buildings. PWP reported that cracking was visible in three brick piers and suggested that remedial ties should be installed, the situation monitored and £20,000 be retained for future remedial work.

Serious increases in crack size were subsequently recorded which were later accepted as being consistent with compression failure. Remedial works cost substantially more than the £20,000 PWP had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll