header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Cracking it

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
06 December 2013 / Ross Risby
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
web_risby

Ross Risby highlights the value of selecting the best experts in professional negligence litigation
The expert evidence given at trial often plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate outcome of professional negligence litigation. Three recent cases act as reminders of the importance which needs to be placed on selection of the experts, if a party is to be given the best chance of success at trial.

 

Survey failings

In Igloo Regeneration (General Partner) Ltd v Powell William Partnership [2013] EWHC 1718 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 257 (Jun) the claimant had bought historic mill buildings in Leeds in 2003. Prior to the purchase, it engaged the defendant surveyors and engineers (PWP) to survey those buildings. PWP reported that cracking was visible in three brick piers and suggested that remedial ties should be installed, the situation monitored and £20,000 be retained for future remedial work.

Serious increases in crack size were subsequently recorded which were later accepted as being consistent with compression failure. Remedial works cost substantially more than the £20,000 PWP had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The pension split at 25
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
NLJ this week: Exclusion zone?
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll