header-logo header-logo

The creditors’ claims (3)

28 March 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_duncan

Simon Duncan continues to explore who has the right to sue former directors under s 15(1) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

Section 15(1) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) imposes personal liability for the relevant debts of the company on a disqualified director where he has been involved in the management of the company. However, s 15(1) is silent as to who may bring such a claim. The case law holds that such a right vests by statute in a creditor, not a liquidator see Re Prestige Grinding Limited [2005] EWHC 3076 (Ch), [2006] 1 BCLC 440 (and “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175).

Prestige is also authority for the proposition that the liquidator has a right to claim a contribution from the disqualified director where the general law allows. However, if the s 15(1) claim could be pursued by a liquidator, it is said this would set up a right of contribution from the disqualified director against the company in liquidation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll