header-logo header-logo

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar steps up action in the face of cuts

Barristers unite in protest against ‘broken’ criminal justice system

The Bar has rallied in support of its criminal law colleagues, as more sets join the action against fee cuts imposed by changes to the advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS).

Criminal law barristers have been rejecting new defence work under the AGFS scheme since 1 April in protest at reforms to the scheme which came into force on the same day.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) said a first day of action is currently being planned, and it is setting up circuit sub-committees for its members and will hold another Heads of Chambers meeting to consider ‘both the progress of the action and the possibility of escalation’. It will also meet with solicitor groups to decide how both camps can support each other, and is consulting the Northern Ireland Criminal Bar Association who had a nine-month dispute over legal aid fees in 2015/16, which was resolved by mediation.

Dozens of chambers are now rejecting defence work. A statement from 5KBW said: ‘If we do not take a stand now, we become complicit in permitting our justice system to collapse’. 9 Gough Square said: ‘The underfunding of the criminal justice system has led to a system that is broken; we must act now.’

In a message to barristers this week, Criminal Bar Association chair Angela Rafferty QC said: ‘The dismal state of criminal justice can be improved immensely by relatively modest amounts of investment.

‘The swingeing cuts to the department for the last decades are entirely unjustified and have brought the system to its knees. That is what this action is about.’

Rafferty thanked solicitor colleagues for their support and ‘for the valiant efforts they have made this week when their cases were listed, and they did not have counsel.

‘They too are completely undervalued, mistreated and underfunded.’

An Old Bailey murder trial in which a man, Kema Salum, is accused of murdering his wife was the first to be affected last week when his solicitor told the court she had contacted more than 20 chambers but could not find a barrister prepared to take on the case.

An MoJ spokesperson commented: ‘Any action to disrupt the courts is unacceptable and we are taking all necessary steps to ensure legal representation is available for defendants in criminal cases.

‘We greatly value the work of criminal advocates and will continue to engage with the Bar over their concerns regarding the AGFS scheme. Our reforms are fairer, and replace an archaic scheme under which barristers billed by pages of evidence.’

Chris Dale, founder of the eDisclosure Information Project, reviews the Secret Barrister’s Stories of the Law and How It’s Broken, which describes the state of the criminal justice system, in this week’s NLJ.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll