header-logo header-logo

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal proposals deemed ‘inadequate’

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation on reforms proposed by the criminal legal aid review closed this week, with alarm bells raised across the profession

The review was conducted by Sir Christopher Bellamy, who was made a minister at the Ministry of Justice this week, replacing Lord Wolfson, who resigned in April in protest at Partygate. Sir Christopher called for an immediate minimum remuneration increase of 15% across the board. However, the MoJ’s proposals came under fire from solicitors for falling short.

Responding, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The government proposals amount to just 9%, which is woefully inadequate.

‘This will not reverse the damage to our criminal justice system, persuade young lawyers that they could have a viable career in this sector, prevent the closure of more criminal legal aid firms, or enable the courts backlog to be addressed. Criminal courts are crippled by a lack of judges, court staff, prosecutors and defence lawyers.’

The Bar Council, in its response, warned several of the MoJ’s proposals for changes to the fee schemes were made on the basis they were ‘cost-neutral’. It said: ‘We support investment that is evidence-based. Sir Christopher recommended that the 15% was to be the first step. For the government to state that further changes must be cost-neutral is saying that the government will ignore the evidence.’

Also, any investment would come to advocates ‘many months or even years after Sir Christopher recommended it, with inflation having eroded the benefit of any increase’.

Currently, defence counsel receives £75 for half-day trials and £150 for full-day trials in the magistrates’ court, while the Crown Prosecution Service pays its counsel twice this rate. The Bar Council called for ‘parity’ at ‘the very least’.

CILEX, in its response, said the fees uplifts were ‘a step in the right direction’ but called for an impact review in 24 months and urged the government to grant CILEX professionals higher rights of audience.

The Criminal Bar Association is due to ballot its members this weekend on whether to escalate its protest action. Members have been refusing returns since April.
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll