header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / Chris Bushell , Ceri Morgan
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Customer payments: Held to account

28458
Processing customer payments: key litigation risks for banks, examined by Chris Bushell & Ceri Morgan

In brief

  • Quincecare duty of care (payment made).
  • Dishonest assistance (payment made).
  • Breach of contract claims (payment not made).

In a trend of recent cases, the court has considered the duties owed by banks to their customers in relation to processing payments into and out of their current or depository accounts. These claims are remarkable both because of the variety of different but intertwining causes of action which have been pursued, and because they stem from such an unremarkable and essential function.

The common theme is that the customer’s payment mandate was made in circumstances where the bank (allegedly) was, or should have been, alerted to the existence of fraud or inappropriate activity in relation to the account. The judgments emphasise the public policy of enlisting banks and financial institutions in the fight against financial crime and money laundering, which has influenced the court’s decision as to whether the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll