header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / Chris Bushell , Ceri Morgan
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Customer payments: Held to account

28458
Processing customer payments: key litigation risks for banks, examined by Chris Bushell & Ceri Morgan

In brief

  • Quincecare duty of care (payment made).
  • Dishonest assistance (payment made).
  • Breach of contract claims (payment not made).

In a trend of recent cases, the court has considered the duties owed by banks to their customers in relation to processing payments into and out of their current or depository accounts. These claims are remarkable both because of the variety of different but intertwining causes of action which have been pursued, and because they stem from such an unremarkable and essential function.

The common theme is that the customer’s payment mandate was made in circumstances where the bank (allegedly) was, or should have been, alerted to the existence of fraud or inappropriate activity in relation to the account. The judgments emphasise the public policy of enlisting banks and financial institutions in the fight against financial crime and money laundering, which has influenced the court’s decision as to whether the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll