header-logo header-logo

Customer payments: Held to account

30 September 2020 / Chris Bushell , Ceri Morgan
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail
28458
Processing customer payments: key litigation risks for banks, examined by Chris Bushell & Ceri Morgan

In brief

  • Quincecare duty of care (payment made).
  • Dishonest assistance (payment made).
  • Breach of contract claims (payment not made).

In a trend of recent cases, the court has considered the duties owed by banks to their customers in relation to processing payments into and out of their current or depository accounts. These claims are remarkable both because of the variety of different but intertwining causes of action which have been pursued, and because they stem from such an unremarkable and essential function.

The common theme is that the customer’s payment mandate was made in circumstances where the bank (allegedly) was, or should have been, alerted to the existence of fraud or inappropriate activity in relation to the account. The judgments emphasise the public policy of enlisting banks and financial institutions in the fight against financial crime and money laundering, which has influenced the court’s decision as to whether the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll