header-logo header-logo

Debunking rape myths

24 January 2008 / Anthony Heaton-Armstrong , David Wolchover
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

David Wolchover and Anthony Heaton-Armstrong pour cold water on the government’s rape trial myth-busting proposals

There is an air of desperation about the latest effort by the authorities to show they are on the case in responding to demands that “something must be done” in getting more rapists jailed. On 14 January it was widely reported that police and prosecutors are considering use of the “text sting”, a stratagem imported from the US and Canada in which complainants under police management will try to trap their alleged tormentors into making written apologies by sending such heartfelt recriminations as: “How could you have treated me like that?”

 

On the very same day, The Guardian published extracts from the journal of a woman detailing the obstacles she had faced from police and prosecutors in her vain attempt to get her stepfather tried for rape. An accompanying article dealt with the “justice gap” between reported rapes and convictions and there followed the next day in the same newspaper a further account

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll