header-logo header-logo

31 January 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Defining domestic abuse

David Burrows assesses the most striking aspects of the draft Domestic Abuse Bill

I have just finished reading the second of Elena Ferrante’s four-part series on Neapolitan life in the 1950s and 60s. I take the series to be semi-autobiographical. In Naples, it seems, violence against wives was endemic; and—of her time—it goes with little comment from Ferrante.

In the early 1970s, Erin Pizzey made us realise—those that did not already—that domestic violence was endemic in our society too. Her ‘battered wives home’ in Chelsea was described by Lord Denning MR in Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264, [1978] 1 All ER 1132 (in the Court of Appeal at [270]): ‘“Battered wives” is a telling phrase. It was invented to call the attention of the public to an evil. Few were aware of it. It arose when a woman suffered serious or repeated physical injury a from the man [sic] with whom she lived. She might be a wife properly married to her husband: or she might only be a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll