header-logo header-logo

10 May 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Devonshires Claims

Devonshires creates PI law firm following merger 
National law firm Devonshires has merged its clinical negligence department with pioneering barrister-led firm PI Law Direct to create Devonshires Claims, a specialist clinical negligence and personal injury practice.  

The new firm – which is 75% owned by Devonshires Solicitors LLP – is based at its central London offices. The remaining 25% is owned by PI Law Direct’s founders: including 9 Gough Chambers barristers Jeremy Crowther and Adam Dawson, and Malcolm Gordon a solicitor from St Giles Insurance & Finance Services Ltd, who helped create PI Law in 2014.

Devonshires Claims, which opened on May 1, is an alternative business structure (ABS) regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

It will be led by managing director Nick Grant, previously a partner at Devonshires, with four other representatives from Devonshires Solicitors LLP and three from PI Law making up the board of directors. 

Devonshires will provide its back-office support. In total there will be 14 fee-earners at Devonshires Claims: 10 from Devonshires and four from PI Law Direct.

PI Law Direct was an ABS licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the first barrister-led personal injury law firm where a barrister managed the claim from start to finish.

Devonshires Claims will concentrate on birth injuries and catastrophic injury claims, but will handle all kinds of clinical negligence and personal injury claims.

Nick Grant (pictured) says: “Having the expertise of our clinical negligence team with that of PI Law Direct under one roof offers our clients a wide range of legal skills when bringing a claim. When we met with the team from PI Law, it became clear that a merger was the perfect marriage that will help them to handle the large number of referrals they receive. It will also allow us to offer clients the best possible service.”

Malcolm Gordon says: “We are tremendously excited by the opportunity the merger provides as our business grows.   We were immediately struck by the synergy between our two teams, and with Nick at the helm look forward to providing unrivalled levels of service to our many clients in the years to come”.



MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll