header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009 / Joy Davies
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directing to educating?

Joy Davies looks to the next 20 years of civil & commercial mediation

It is increasingly difficult to answer the question about the future of UK civil and commercial mediation given the surprising developments in the promotion of mediation as a method of dispute resolution during the last 10 years. It could go one of two ways: (i) judicial and government-led compulsion or (ii) a return to grass-roots level with control being returned to the end user. The Access to Justice Report, government pledges, judicial decisions, alternative dispute resoltuion service providers, the Civil Mediation Council and court mediation schemes have, during this period, been both allies and competitors for the position to control or influence the agenda for the development of what currently appears to be a market for mediation that is static.

What happened to the development of this exciting, new, interesting, practical and commercial method of resolving disputes that began filtering into legal practice 20 years ago?

Have the detractors who thought mediation to be inappropriate, unsophisticated, hit and miss, a threat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll