header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009 / Joy Davies
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directing to educating?

Joy Davies looks to the next 20 years of civil & commercial mediation

It is increasingly difficult to answer the question about the future of UK civil and commercial mediation given the surprising developments in the promotion of mediation as a method of dispute resolution during the last 10 years. It could go one of two ways: (i) judicial and government-led compulsion or (ii) a return to grass-roots level with control being returned to the end user. The Access to Justice Report, government pledges, judicial decisions, alternative dispute resoltuion service providers, the Civil Mediation Council and court mediation schemes have, during this period, been both allies and competitors for the position to control or influence the agenda for the development of what currently appears to be a market for mediation that is static.

What happened to the development of this exciting, new, interesting, practical and commercial method of resolving disputes that began filtering into legal practice 20 years ago?

Have the detractors who thought mediation to be inappropriate, unsophisticated, hit and miss, a threat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll