header-logo header-logo

Divorce orders: breaking up & making up

02 December 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
102824
Getting back together? David Burrows examines the setting aside of divorce orders where a couple has reconciled
  • Recission (setting aside) of divorce orders in the family court, in relation to divorce and civil partnership after the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020.

The facts of Cazalet v Abu-zalaf [2022] EWFC 119 (17 October 2022) by Mr Justice Mostyn are very unusual; but the case recalls the availability of recission (setting aside) of divorce orders in the family court, and that the court may have a residual power to rescind conditional orders where—in a jurisdiction which requires only a unilateral assertion of irretrievable breakdown—a couple have in fact become reconciled. And where the court finds that a couple are reconciled—whatever may have been said as to irretrievable breakdown on the filing of any dissolution application—has the court the power to rescind a conditional order?

Recission will be considered in relation to divorce and civil partnership after the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020) which, by amendments

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll