header-logo header-logo

Divorce orders: breaking up & making up

02 December 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
102824
Getting back together? David Burrows examines the setting aside of divorce orders where a couple has reconciled
  • Recission (setting aside) of divorce orders in the family court, in relation to divorce and civil partnership after the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020.

The facts of Cazalet v Abu-zalaf [2022] EWFC 119 (17 October 2022) by Mr Justice Mostyn are very unusual; but the case recalls the availability of recission (setting aside) of divorce orders in the family court, and that the court may have a residual power to rescind conditional orders where—in a jurisdiction which requires only a unilateral assertion of irretrievable breakdown—a couple have in fact become reconciled. And where the court finds that a couple are reconciled—whatever may have been said as to irretrievable breakdown on the filing of any dissolution application—has the court the power to rescind a conditional order?

Recission will be considered in relation to divorce and civil partnership after the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020) which, by amendments

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll