header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

DIY justice

nlj_7657_robins

Jon Robins monitors the rise & rise of non-lawyers in the courtroom

Lawyers were reminded earlier this month how best to deal with some of the more alarming features of the new post-LASPO landscape, in particular the new generation of litigants-in-person and the burgeoning satellite industry of McKenzie Friends.

Guidelines

Lawyers were advised to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach at all times” in their dealings with unrepresented litigants, according to the new guidelines co-published by the Law Society, Bar Council, and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives. Such civility was extended even to lawyers’ latest bête noire, McKenzie friends. “The essential requirement of courtesy, as with any litigants in person, remains,” they added.

Well, up to a point. Lawyers were also told if McKenzie friends had the audacity to charge a fee higher than their own then this might be “a point that you might wish to draw to the court’s or the Litigant in Person’s (LiP’s) attention”. The chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Susan Jacklin QC, recently went so far as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll