header-logo header-logo

04 July 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Do we have to leave the EU?

nlj_7706_comment_bindman

The final say on EU membership is & should be with Parliament, says Geoffrey Bindman QC

The referendum has not been a common feature of British political history and for good reason. It is a blunt instrument. The question it poses has to be simple and broad, but a yes or no response is an unreliable guide to policy on a complex and many-sided topic. The final say on EU membership is and should be with Parliament.

Odd as it may seem to many, the referendum result has no legal effect whatsoever. The European Referendum Act 2015 sets out the terms and conditions on which the referendum took place, but it does not impose any duty on Government or on Parliament to legislate. The Act is completely silent on the consequences of a vote either to leave or to remain.

Only twice previously has there been a referendum of the whole UK. In 1975 there was an overwhelming vote in favour of remaining in the European

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll