header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Employment , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

INJUSTICE AND MENTAL DISORDER >>
DEFICIENT DOCTORS >>
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS >>
CARE WORKERS’ RIGHTS >>

DIMINISHED CREDIBILITY

It is undeniable that where mental disorder is concerned there is always significant scope for abuse and, therefore in criminal proceedings, injustice. Psychiatric disorder is still diagnosed on largely subjective grounds, mostly on what a patient tells, or keeps from, a doctor.
The matter is of some importance in cases of homicide where mental disorder may form the basis for the partial defence of diminished
responsibility which, if successful, reduces murder to manslaughter. R v Latus [2006] EWCA Crim 3187, [2006] All ER (D) 280 (Dec)
offered the opportunity to explore the vexed issue of second thoughts in defence pleas.

The appellant had been convicted of murder in 2003. The victim had been a friend of the appellant who suffered from mental illness, apparently drug-induced psychosis. The victim had been killed, his head severed from the body and the body then transported elsewhere by car. The appellant had also been convicted of other serious criminal offences including manslaughter,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll