header-logo header-logo

31 August 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Don’t Blame the Judges: a rejoinder

The plight of English law is indeed dire, but a simple solution is ready to hand, says Dr Michael Arnheim
I hardly recognised my last article from Sir Geoffrey Bindman’s recent comment (‘Don’t blame the judges! Too quick to judge?’, NLJ, August 2020). My article flagged up three recent cases picked almost at random to illustrate the serious plight of English law (‘Don’t blame the judges!’, NLJ, 3 July 2020). Two of these cases are not even mentioned in Sir Geoffrey’s attempted attack on my article. 

One of the cases not mentioned by Sir Geoffrey is Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants  [2020] UKSC 13, in which 126 victims of sexual assaults by the late Dr Gordon Bates lost their case in the UK Supreme court (UKSC) after winning at first instance and also in the Court of Appeal. They were suing Barclays Bank, on whose behalf Dr Bates performed medical examinations on prospective bank employees. Barclays was found vicariously liable in the High Court and Court of Appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll