header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Double family intestacy

Michael Tringham traces the expensive consequences of avoiding a bill

The Booth family’s probate troubles started with a £7,000 builder’s bill that farmer Edward Booth preferred not to pay. It has reached a Jarndyce-like finale—compounded by intestacy, allegations of forgery, secret gifts, false under-valuation, bankruptcy, even an illegitimacy, three separate trials—and an estimated six figures in legal costs, according to losing litigant Norman Booth, who told the Huddersfield Daily Examiner: “I shall have to pay [my siblings] out but there will be nothing left for nobody because the fees have to come out of the estate.”

Looking behind the legal reasons why Norman Booth lost his appeal against his siblings’ claim based on their mother’s intestacy shows how, from one small event —itself long since settled—unexpected consequences may flow.

Almost 40 years ago Edward Booth bought Silver Ings Farm in Skelmanthorpe, West Yorkshire, of which he was the tenant, from the Saville Estate. By the 1980s he had entered into a farming partnership with his son Norman. Around 1982 he engaged a local builder

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll