header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Caroline East
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Ducks in a row

nlj_7739_east

The Brewster case has bolstered public sector pension rights of unmarried couples, but it is better to be prepared, says Caroline East

  • Administrators of public sector pension schemes should not discriminate unfairly on grounds of marital status.
  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions concerned that a change in the law would see full retrospective pension benefits being granted to civil partners.

In certain circumstances, a cohabitee may be able to claim a survivor’s pension on the death of his/her partner. Such was the case of Denise Brewster who lived with her partner, William McMullan, for approximately ten years. They became engaged on 24 December 2009 but sadly Mr McMullan died unexpectedly two days later.

Mr McMullan had been employed by Translink, a public transport operator, for about 15 years (up until his death) and had contributed to the Local Government Pension Scheme throughout that time. The scheme was governed by the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/3093).

The administrators of the scheme denied Ms Brewster access to a survivor’s pension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll