header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Caroline East
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Ducks in a row

nlj_7739_east

The Brewster case has bolstered public sector pension rights of unmarried couples, but it is better to be prepared, says Caroline East

  • Administrators of public sector pension schemes should not discriminate unfairly on grounds of marital status.
  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions concerned that a change in the law would see full retrospective pension benefits being granted to civil partners.

In certain circumstances, a cohabitee may be able to claim a survivor’s pension on the death of his/her partner. Such was the case of Denise Brewster who lived with her partner, William McMullan, for approximately ten years. They became engaged on 24 December 2009 but sadly Mr McMullan died unexpectedly two days later.

Mr McMullan had been employed by Translink, a public transport operator, for about 15 years (up until his death) and had contributed to the Local Government Pension Scheme throughout that time. The scheme was governed by the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/3093).

The administrators of the scheme denied Ms Brewster access to a survivor’s pension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
back-to-top-scroll