header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Caroline East
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Ducks in a row

nlj_7739_east

The Brewster case has bolstered public sector pension rights of unmarried couples, but it is better to be prepared, says Caroline East

  • Administrators of public sector pension schemes should not discriminate unfairly on grounds of marital status.
  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions concerned that a change in the law would see full retrospective pension benefits being granted to civil partners.

In certain circumstances, a cohabitee may be able to claim a survivor’s pension on the death of his/her partner. Such was the case of Denise Brewster who lived with her partner, William McMullan, for approximately ten years. They became engaged on 24 December 2009 but sadly Mr McMullan died unexpectedly two days later.

Mr McMullan had been employed by Translink, a public transport operator, for about 15 years (up until his death) and had contributed to the Local Government Pension Scheme throughout that time. The scheme was governed by the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/3093).

The administrators of the scheme denied Ms Brewster access to a survivor’s pension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll