header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Margaret Mannell
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Opinion , Practice areas , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Embracing diversity

Firms need to do more than tick the diversity boxes in today's market, says Margaret Mannell

Here’s a little challenge. Visit 20 major UK law firms’ websites and see how many of them don’t refer to their commitment to “diversity”. I’m pretty sure you won’t find a single defaulter and that’s how it should be. But it’s one thing to “tick the diversity box” and quite another to genuinely embrace diversity and recognise its fundamental contribution to the health and continuing success of a legal practice.

Reality and rules

Of course, diversity-related employment policies—in simple terms, formal recognition and accommodation of difference in the workplace—are now underpinned by legislation. Even if they weren’t, diversity makes obvious business sense. Organisations need talented people and it’s absurd to reject talent simply because of irrational prejudice.

Commercial DNA

From my perspective, although UK law firms have made great strides in this area, they still tend to approach diversity in a rather mechanical fashion whereas, for their US counterparts, diversity is largely part of their commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll