header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Margaret Mannell
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Opinion , Practice areas , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Embracing diversity

Firms need to do more than tick the diversity boxes in today's market, says Margaret Mannell

Here’s a little challenge. Visit 20 major UK law firms’ websites and see how many of them don’t refer to their commitment to “diversity”. I’m pretty sure you won’t find a single defaulter and that’s how it should be. But it’s one thing to “tick the diversity box” and quite another to genuinely embrace diversity and recognise its fundamental contribution to the health and continuing success of a legal practice.

Reality and rules

Of course, diversity-related employment policies—in simple terms, formal recognition and accommodation of difference in the workplace—are now underpinned by legislation. Even if they weren’t, diversity makes obvious business sense. Organisations need talented people and it’s absurd to reject talent simply because of irrational prejudice.

Commercial DNA

From my perspective, although UK law firms have made great strides in this area, they still tend to approach diversity in a rather mechanical fashion whereas, for their US counterparts, diversity is largely part of their commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll