header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Margaret Mannell
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Opinion , Practice areas , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Embracing diversity

Firms need to do more than tick the diversity boxes in today's market, says Margaret Mannell

Here’s a little challenge. Visit 20 major UK law firms’ websites and see how many of them don’t refer to their commitment to “diversity”. I’m pretty sure you won’t find a single defaulter and that’s how it should be. But it’s one thing to “tick the diversity box” and quite another to genuinely embrace diversity and recognise its fundamental contribution to the health and continuing success of a legal practice.

Reality and rules

Of course, diversity-related employment policies—in simple terms, formal recognition and accommodation of difference in the workplace—are now underpinned by legislation. Even if they weren’t, diversity makes obvious business sense. Organisations need talented people and it’s absurd to reject talent simply because of irrational prejudice.

Commercial DNA

From my perspective, although UK law firms have made great strides in this area, they still tend to approach diversity in a rather mechanical fashion whereas, for their US counterparts, diversity is largely part of their commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll