header-logo header-logo

13 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Reverend Canon Pemberton v Right Reverend Richard Inwood UKEAT/0072/16/BA, [2016] All ER (D) 80 (Dec)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld the employment tribunal’s decision to dismiss the claims for unlawful direct discrimination because of sexual orientation and/or marital status and unlawful harassment brought by a Church of England priest who had married his long-term male partner. The EAT agreed that the employer acting bishop’s refusal to grant the priest an Extra Parochial Ministry Licence (EPML) was a “relevant qualification” within the meaning of s 54(3) of the Equality Act 2010. Accordingly, the EAT dismissed the cross-appeal by the employer against that decision. The EAT further agreed that as the EPML qualification had been for the purposes of employment for the purposes of an organised religion, the compliance principle had been engaged with the result that the employer had been exempt from liability by reason of para 2 of Sch 9 to the Act.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll