header-logo header-logo

20 January 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 20 January 2023

107047
Ian Smith is back with a bang, rounding up the latest employment updates including COVID fears in the workplace & claims submitted one day out of time
  • Health and safety protection: unfair dismissal and COVID fears.
  • Applying the just and equitable extension of time.
  • Problems with ruling on admissibility of evidence at a preliminary stage.

Just before the Christmas break, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in a case that had been awaited by employment lawyers, concerning the operation of a potentially relevant piece of legislation in COVID-related cases. Ultimately the question was whether an employee dismissed for refusing to return to work for fear of infection could claim the protection of the special unfair dismissal provisions on dismissal for health and safety-connected reasons. We had already had of course the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision (the first at appellate level), but it was possible to argue that that decision was largely on factual issues, leaving much to be examined in more detail.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll