header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 20 January 2023

20 January 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
107047
Ian Smith is back with a bang, rounding up the latest employment updates including COVID fears in the workplace & claims submitted one day out of time
  • Health and safety protection: unfair dismissal and COVID fears.
  • Applying the just and equitable extension of time.
  • Problems with ruling on admissibility of evidence at a preliminary stage.

Just before the Christmas break, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in a case that had been awaited by employment lawyers, concerning the operation of a potentially relevant piece of legislation in COVID-related cases. Ultimately the question was whether an employee dismissed for refusing to return to work for fear of infection could claim the protection of the special unfair dismissal provisions on dismissal for health and safety-connected reasons. We had already had of course the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision (the first at appellate level), but it was possible to argue that that decision was largely on factual issues, leaving much to be examined in more detail.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll