header-logo header-logo

10 February 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination , Tax
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 February 2023

110188
Growing apart? In this month’s employment law brief, Ian Smith considers the ever-diverging paths of tax & employment law, & disciplinary proceedings that just won’t end
  • Effect of tax on employment status.
  • When can it be fair to reopen disciplinary proceedings?
  • A narrow view of marital discrimination.
  • Victimisation—the relevance of bad faith.

This column/epistle/rant has not infrequently mentioned problems arising from the employer practice of ‘fire and rehire’, either to force through changes in employment terms or to effect redundancies. In January, the government published a proposed code of practice on this issue, aimed at putting some curbs on it and giving tribunals more scope to judge its fairness. It is currently out for consultation and its progress will be watched with interest.

In the meantime, the cases considered here cover useful topics related to the effect of tax status on the definition of ‘employee’ for employment law purposes; if and when it can be fair for an employer to reopen what appeared to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll