header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 11 August 2023

133399
Before taking refuge in his beach hut, Ian Smith serves up a summer smorgasbord of Parliament, bias & demotion
  • Restricted rights in disciplinary hearings.
  • Continuation of the employment relationship; applying Hogg v Dover College.
  • Apparent bias and post-hearing conduct of a side member.

It has been a busy month on the legislative front. First, the Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023 came into force on 24 July. It operates entirely by way of amendments to the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

Secondly, the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 received royal assent. Its changes to existing law are that the employer will have to deal with a request within two months (unless an extension is agreed); an employee will be able to make two requests within a 12-month period; the employer will not be able to refuse a request until it has consulted the employee; and the employee will no longer have to explain what effects they think the change would have and how they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll