header-logo header-logo

28 November 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 28 November 2013

web_smith

Ian Smith reports on reasonable adjustments & frustration; normal working hours; & an employer’s duty to cough up for medical treatment

The first case this month illustrates the interplay between the old law of frustration and the modern law of disability discrimination, which has not surfaced before in a reported case. The second case shows that, even where only statute law is concerned, there can still be problems aligning it with common sense (if not common law); the context is the relatively abstruse area of guarantee payments, but the issue in general is one of wider import. The third case examines reasonable adjustments, showing the possible complications when one leaves the relatively safe harbour of adjustments purely to the job itself and enters the less navigable waters of wider possible ameliorations, especially in relation to medical treatment.

The interplay between reasonable adjustments & frustration

The doctrine of frustration is well established in employment law, even if in practice it is likely to be found only rarely. The case law on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll