header-logo header-logo

28 November 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 28 November 2013

web_smith

Ian Smith reports on reasonable adjustments & frustration; normal working hours; & an employer’s duty to cough up for medical treatment

The first case this month illustrates the interplay between the old law of frustration and the modern law of disability discrimination, which has not surfaced before in a reported case. The second case shows that, even where only statute law is concerned, there can still be problems aligning it with common sense (if not common law); the context is the relatively abstruse area of guarantee payments, but the issue in general is one of wider import. The third case examines reasonable adjustments, showing the possible complications when one leaves the relatively safe harbour of adjustments purely to the job itself and enters the less navigable waters of wider possible ameliorations, especially in relation to medical treatment.

The interplay between reasonable adjustments & frustration

The doctrine of frustration is well established in employment law, even if in practice it is likely to be found only rarely. The case law on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll