header-logo header-logo

19 December 2014 / Ian Smith
Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 19 December 2014

Ian Smith signs off for the year reviewing recent employment law decisions

The big news last month was of course the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton UKEAT/0047/13 that overtime needs to be included in statutory holiday pay, at least where it is non-guaranteed by the employer but obligatory on the employee, and at least in relation to the first four weeks. This was followed by the surprising announcement that the backing union did not intend to appeal on the vital point on which it lost, ie the ruling out of most possibilities of backdating claims for non-inclusion of overtime pay. This point, on which the EAT’s decision seemed to go beyond even the employer’s interpretation of the time limit provision, has not gone away, but must now await a further challenge in another case. The EAT’s decision has been considered elsewhere in this August publication and so I will not bore you with it again. Instead, I will bore you with cases on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll