header-logo header-logo

12 March 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 March 2015

nlj_7644_smith

Ian Smith reflects upon the impact of recent employment law developments

First instance decisions need to be treated with some reserve as authorities, even in employment law, but two this month deserve consideration on grounds of law, not fact. The first shows that it may be possible for employees annoyed by a unilateral change in their contracts to seek a remedy by way of declaratory relief; this has always been possible but rarely used and the first case this month shows it might be useful where the changes do not involve any immediate, quantifiable, loss of wages. The second concerns setting up in competition with the employer and raised three issues of law, one of which (unusually in this context) points out an easily-overlooked trap for an employee when relying on the idea of constructive dismissal in a common law case. Two Court of Appeal decisions are then considered. The first arose from the eternal problem of employment status and was the second time this protracted litigation had been there. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll