header-logo header-logo

10 December 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 December 2015

nlj_7680_smith

Ian Smith provides an overview of some helpful employment decisions from the CJEU

Unusually, this month’s column comprises three decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on EU employment law. Equally unusually, they are all quite helpful. The second and third effectively bolster existing UK domestic law, legitimising our longstanding inclusion of constructive dismissals in the law on collective redundancies consultation and stressing the need for a true comparison in cases of direct discrimination (here, age). The first gives further guidance as to how to apply the law on “one-size-fits-all” (copyright Lord Hope) statutory holiday entitlement to the myriad possibilities that can arise; the case specifically concerned the problem of calculation where the employee moves from part-time to full-time working part of the way through the holiday year. The guidance is indeed useful, but here it reinforces a problem (known for some time now) that domestic law may not be easy to square with the growing EU case law.

Greenfield v Care Bureau Ltd

Harvey at CI

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll