header-logo header-logo

14 April 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 April 2016

Ian Smith rounds up the latest developments in the world of employment law

The four Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases considered this time reflect a common mixture in employment law of ancient and modern. The first three concern longstanding issues in basic individual employment law, namely: (i) the relationship between constructive dismissal and overall unfairness; (ii) how a tribunal should deal with a sickness case where the allegation is that the employee has been indulging in an unacceptable element of lead-swinging; and (iii) returning to constructive dismissal, how it should be applied in a redundancy (as opposed to unfair dismissal) context. The fourth case, however, concerns a very modern concept, namely salary sacrifice schemes, and how they fit into existing law. The particular issue, on which there has been some speculation recently, was whether childcare benefits supplied under such a scheme continue to accrue during maternity leave. The EAT, holding that they do not, considers the essential nature of such schemes and holds that they constitute “remuneration” for statutory purposes. This is an interesting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll