header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law Brief: 22 May 2008

illegality and tax status
burden of proof and automatic unfairness
protection from harassment

Several years ago, one learned lord justice said extra-judicially that he had always thought that slavery had been abolished in this country until he had been appointed to the Court of Appeal. That sentiment has perhaps been borne out in the employment law sphere with a sudden rush of cases in that court in the last month.

In Kalwak and another v Consistent Group Ltd  [2008] EWCA Civ 430, [2008] All ER (D) 394 (Apr) the court overturned a well known decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) extending employment status (and hence protection) to Polish workers imported into this country by an agency whose documentation then went out of its way to deny any employment relationship. The decision was largely because of defective reasoning by the tribunal and the result was that the case was remitted for a rehearing (which will be interesting).

In Amicus and others v Dynamex Friction Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 381,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll