header-logo header-logo

20 October 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 20 October 2016

nlj_7719_smith

Ian Smith rounds up the latest employment news

  • Old principles of fair treatment of staff in employment law abut on to the modern laws on child protection.
  • When can you establish an oral express term in a contract of employment, when there is no supporting documentary evidence?
  • Who is a “client” in a TUPE case?
  • When is a union liable for the acts of its elected official?

At a time when the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse is sinking into major problems of staffing, scope and timing, it is perhaps appropriate that the first case this month concerns the serious difficulties encountered when old principles of fair treatment of staff in employment law abut on to the modern laws on child protection. It split the Court of Appeal fundamentally, with the doyen of employment law, Elias LJ, being contradicted by a noted family law judge, and the third lord justice siding with the latter in no uncertain terms. This circle is proving to be particularly hard to square.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll