header-logo header-logo

10 December 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 December 2021

66823
Get me out of here! In his end of year address, Ian Smith navigates a series of obstacles & challenges including notification, blacklisting, reconsideration, anonymisation & postponements
  • Collective redundancies—notification to BEIS.
  • Detriment on union grounds and blacklisting.
  • Three points on procedure.

The first two cases considered here, on issues of substantive law, concern rather unusual aspects of employment law, namely: (1) the interpretation of the law on collective redundancies, but not in the usual context of the obligation to consult worker representatives, but rather in relation to the rarely litigated separate administrative obligation to inform the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS); and (2) the relationship between the general law on detriment for trade union reasons and the much more specialised provisions on the unlawful keeping of blacklists.

The third case concerns employment tribunal (ET) procedure. It arose in the course of prolonged litigation which has now been to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) twice and is notable for guidance given by that body on three different

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll