header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 19 April 2018

19 April 2018 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7789_smith

Ian Smith celebrates an anniversary & is proof that quality never goes out of fashion

  • The employment lawyers’ mantra: in employment there may simply be no definitive answer.
  • If an example is wanted, perhaps TUPE will suffice, where in advising a client you soon run out of law and start looking for a workable answer that is least likely to incur legal liability.

This month’s Brief constitutes something of a personal milestone, as it is my 200th column. To mark this, I thought it might be of interest to look back to the very first column and then at the 100th, to look for areas of development or alternatively continuity in this crazy subject of employment law. One of the problems of looking back is the frequent difficulty of combining a realisation of just how far we have come in a short time (including in this period the internet revolution and its effects on legal matters) with the opposite factor of how many problems and issues remain remarkably immutable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll