header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 December 2018

​In his December brief Ian Smith rounds off the year & leaves a few treats underneath the Christmas tree

  • Private hire vehicles & ‘worker’ status.
  • Employee rights while receiving long-term sickness insurance.
  • Carrying forward untaken statutory holidays: the obligations of the employer.

As you, gentle reader, read this on Christmas Day afternoon, in your study hiding from the family and other seasonal irritants, you will see that the cases below illustrate several different types of issue in employment law at the moment. The first (on the worker status of drivers of private hire vehicles) is an example of a highly topical area where the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) is still feeling its way on ‘gig economy’ problems as we await further guidance from the higher courts. The second (on an employee’s rights not to be dismissed if that would frustrate his or her continued receipt of long-term sickness insurance payments) is by contrast a very old problem, previously called ‘the PHI cases’, which can still rear up and bite the unwary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll