header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 December 2018

​In his December brief Ian Smith rounds off the year & leaves a few treats underneath the Christmas tree

  • Private hire vehicles & ‘worker’ status.
  • Employee rights while receiving long-term sickness insurance.
  • Carrying forward untaken statutory holidays: the obligations of the employer.

As you, gentle reader, read this on Christmas Day afternoon, in your study hiding from the family and other seasonal irritants, you will see that the cases below illustrate several different types of issue in employment law at the moment. The first (on the worker status of drivers of private hire vehicles) is an example of a highly topical area where the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) is still feeling its way on ‘gig economy’ problems as we await further guidance from the higher courts. The second (on an employee’s rights not to be dismissed if that would frustrate his or her continued receipt of long-term sickness insurance payments) is by contrast a very old problem, previously called ‘the PHI cases’, which can still rear up and bite the unwary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll